David Bowie - Life On Mars. Pianist Reuel. Alexandra Stan Romanian Singer. Source: hellyeahalexandrastan, tumblr, alexandra-love, livejournal. More Cards My husband does post-production work for a media company, and everyone was watching the Ellen interview with the little boy. He said one of his co-workers yelled at the TV screen "For the love of God, would someone please take this kid to a Mets game?
I would bet She made the decission on the song use , and it was hers to make alone. THE point is also irrelevant to our dissussion as I see it-- but pleaee point out my mistake there if you see it. Karl profile , 24 May pm. Ans: I doubt that. If you sign to a label, you do not own the copyright on your material. Even the biggest artists out there Beatles, Rolling Stones, U2, etc don't own the copyrights to their music. They are owned by their record labels.
In the Beatles' case, they are owned by the estate of Michael Jackson. There is no question that Lady Gaga does not own the copyrights to her music, either. Perhaps if the rest of the albums on her contract are all mega-hits, she can negotiate with the label for future copyrights in her new contract It makes sense, because copyrights are publishing rights, and labels are the publishers. So, A. But - if you accept this point, then you cannot accept that copyright "protects artists," nor that infringement "hurts" them.
Even the biggest artists out there Beatles, Rolling Stones, U2, etc don't own the copyrights to their music" by Artist choice yes. Argued December 8, Decided March 1, Full case name, John Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc. Read and get back to me. CCR disbanded in , and Fogerty began a solo career with another music label. A jury found in favor of Fogerty, that is the point!!!! It is not optional; unless you relinquish your copyright to the label, they can't legally publish your music.
In the case of major labels, none will sign a contract with you unless you relinquish the exclusive rights to your music. And in order to even get to the bargaining stage with the label, you will have to sign a "deal memo. Minor labels usually operate the same way, but occasionally they will strike a "licensing" deal, meaning they only hold the copyrights for a specified length of time.
Occasionally the rights will be non-exclusive, but that's amazingly rare it usually applies only to licensing in different countries. John Fogerty v. This case only had to do with whether the defendant in a copyright infringement suit could sue for legal fees previously, the answer was no. Without holding legal copyright, the artist does not have any rights to their art. The copyright is held by the artist by default, until they relinquish it to the publisher.
If they're self-published, no rights are transferred Other artists got to pay to cover RTJ to the current owner of the publishing rights , but John does not , because he wrote it!!!! Even if he still does not own the legal publishing rights NOW. This is why I see copyright coming out of Natural Law , as artist ownership of created works , EVEN trumps whoever may legally currently own the publishing rights. For his own use and personal profit ,, the artist cannot give up rights. Just like stock and bonds, that are not the biz itself.
That was the dispute , and it was ruled in J. Big Time. It had nothing to do with the fact that Fogerty wrote the first song.
He cannot record it without infringing on copyright, unless he gets permission from Fantasy. Don't believe me? The copyright infringement claim went to trial and a jury returned a verdict in favor of Fogerty. A beneficial owner has no independent right to use or license the copyright, Conti ruled, but merely an economic interest in the legal owners' exercise of these rights.
A beneficial owner may bring an infringement action against third parties to protect this economic interest. However, a beneficial owner who seeks to exercise the legal owner's rights may be liable for infringement. Thus a beneficial owner cannot create a new work based upon the original without the legal owner's consent, as Fantasy had alleged. Emphasis mine. But I bellieve it was eventuallly resolved , where John's orginal authorship was a legal factor.. Remember : Chords : cannot copyright Melody is messy Lyrics clear.
Sue me. This is not my job. When Mike is wrong, it is his job. F vs evil record company case record, is open to all, it was hailed as an artists victory, as I remember , , but It is not my formal job to remember things.
That why we got Lawyers. I paraphrase here: The test starts with being asked to explain why a mouse is kosher. But a mouse it not Kosher. The senior Rabbis insist , and demands a list of of reasons why a mouse is kosher from the aspiring young Rabbi. He Toils for days , combs through tomes of Jewish law.
The young Rabbi presents his reasons on why a mouse is kosher to the Senior Rabbis testing him. They read the list they. They tell him he did a great job. You can give me reason why a mouse is not kosher , all well researched for Jewish Law. You passed the test you are now a young Senior Rabbi.
But the Answer is : Piracy is Illegal. Perhaps people are just in a collective bad mood. What else could explain why New Yorkers — notoriously hardened to the slings and arrows of everyday life here — are spitting on bus drivers? No weapon was involved in these episodes. And the encounters, while distressing, appeared to take a surprisingly severe toll: the 51 drivers who went on paid leave after a spitting incident took, on average, 64 days off work — the equivalent of three months with pay.
One driver, who was not identified by the authority, spent days on paid leave. And officials at Transport Workers Union Local , which represents city bus operators, said the extended absences were justified. In response, the authority offered classes to drivers on defusing tense situations. Plastic partitions for drivers have been tested, but a design has not been set.
Yet spitting assaults have grown. More than 80 drivers reported being spat upon in the last year, the authority said. Enforcement may be an issue.
Almost no arrests have been reported for spitting on a driver, said Mr. Bus drivers interviewed Monday said they frequently heard about episodes involving spit. Davis said, referring to the drivers.
Raul Morales, 52, has been driving city buses for five years, but his first encounter with spit came early. Morales said. Morales said it did not occur to him to take an extended absence to recover. Alan E. Pisarski said. Come June in New York City, that burden will grow.
Dozens of local and express bus lines will be eliminated, taking the brunt of an austere slate of service cuts by the authority. Fewer riders on the subway will be affected. On the bus, the driver is the flashpoint. Technopolitical profile , 25 May am. Anonymous Coward , 25 May am. Listen and get back to me , Anonymously Brave , 24 May pm. Keep in mind, your control over your "art" is limited to the rights provided by law.
The only way to hold "complete" control over your art is to keep it to yourself -- locked away where no one even knows it exists. Once you make it available to the public -- for rent, purchase, or whatever -- your rights are limited to those provided by law. I applaud you for at least providing some access to your music, however your choice of wording compelled me to comment.
Applause is always nice. Pay me. Ans: I figure if someone wants to take the trouble to record -- G-D Bless them!! Thank You. Ans: No. I know what I am saying , it is not meant to put you off. ANS: Example please. But I can put a limtited time on your use.
I do have the right to withdraw my art, and say you can no longer use it , if 1st stated by me before purchase , and agreed to by that purchase. And that the extra effort must be put up by your fans? Doesn't that limit what control you have? For the sake of simplicity, lets say I bought it in the normal fashion, and without any special 'limited time', or 'right to withdraw' clauses in the contract of sale.
Say the CD Broke, got scratched, or was somehow otherwise damaged. To rectify this, I download your music, and burn a new CD, to replace the broken one. Do you think this should be allowed? I will get back to you ,, but I got a busy day here ,, look later. If you got a?? Post ,, but I will not reply for a while , , A little overload ,, Mike's not paying me to be here.
I am here because i feel strong about Piracy and copyright law. See e. But that is what this often-used argument is: An excuse. But then toi stand between the chairs again: Just leave it — ou guilty conscience??? On top, my parents make me frightened with their reports about documentaries they saw, heard ou read. I just want to listen to music! DX Uncomfortable voice in the back of my head: But toi steel the songs from the artists and the bands need the money not everbody is Lady Gaga. Well-known musicians like Lady Gaga , Neil Young , Shakira and several other big acts have stated that they are OK with music piracy, if not in full support of it.
While their reasons vary, it's clear across the board that these artists tend to care more about sharing their music than selling it for a price. Check out what 10 artists have to say about music piracy below and vote on which you agree with or disagree with most. Main Menu U.
0コメント